Objective Knowledge: Three Worlds Theory
Context: Popper published Objective Knowledge, proposing the "three worlds" ontology: World 1 (physical world), World 2 (subjective mental world), World 3 (the world of objective knowledge — theories, books, artworks, and other human mental products with autonomous existence).
Decision: Argue that knowledge (especially scientific theories) has objective existence independent of individual minds, refuting subjectivism and relativism.
Reasoning: If knowledge existed only in individual minds, the objectivity and cross-generational accumulation of science could not be explained; the World 3 concept provides an ontological foundation for the objectivity of knowledge.
Outcome: The three worlds theory sparked wide philosophical controversy, but provided an influential framework for understanding the objectivity of scientific knowledge and cultural transmission.
Lesson: Ontological commitments (answers to "what exists") are the foundation of epistemology — different ontologies lead to different epistemological conclusions.